I finally watched The King’s Speech this weekend. Like most speech-language pathologists, I’ve worked with people who stutter, though I’m by no means a specialist. As I watched the movie I found myself remembering clients—some who agreed to treatment but avoided the work; some who cried; some who transformed themselves; and at least one who blew up in a rage and ran out of the session.
When I was a master’s student, we were assigned homework to practice stuttering. We had to try out different kinds—repeating and elongating sounds, or blocking sound completely—and then we had to experiment with stuttering in public (the coffee shop near our clinic did a huge trade in faux stuttering).
My stuttering couldn’t hold a candle to Colin Firth’s. He was remarkable and mesmerizing (and painful). When I heard him speak in a post-movie interview, I kept waiting for him to revert to the stuttering he made seem to true, so embedded in his body. Similarly, when I heard the recording of the real King George VI, I heard someone who sounded like Colin Firth.
But as compelling as all that stuttering was, something else in the film impressed me more: the balance of power as managed by speech therapist Lionel Logue.
Lionel knew that the relationship was key to treatment. He wasn’t afraid to set the boundaries from the start, even at the risk of losing the client. He insisted that treatment take place in his office: “My game, my turf, my rules.” When the wife pulled out her wild card, “What if [the patient] is the Duke of York?,” Logue was momentarily awed, or at least surprised, but he held firm. “No exceptions.”
Power was negotiated many times in the movie:
- over names: Logue chose “Berti” (from the Duke’s name, Albert) as a way to make the Duke a real person of equal standing, and he requested that the Duke call him Lionel for the same reason. But the Duke persisted in using “Logue” until the pivotal moment when, playing with a model plane, he began revealing more of his painful story.
- over environment: In addition to the aforementioned initial scene about the treatment setting, Logue demanded that Westminster Abby be cleared for practice, standing up to the powerful Archbishop who wished to replace him. He also refused to let the Duke smoke in therapy.
- over legitimacy: My favorite moment—having just been harshly challenged and called a fraud, Logue sat in the King’s chair, thereby violating a boundary set in historic convention. He took the risk in order to goad the King into affirming his own legitimacy: “I have a voice.”
- over touch: Lionel touched the Duke when attempting to convince him that he could, in fact, be King. The Duke drew away in anger, rejecting the intimate move. He then cancelled the sessions until necessity brought him back, when both were willing to acknowledge fault and begin anew (renegotiating the relationship). Later, after his successful pre-war speech, the King reached out to touch Logue and called him “friend,” acknowledging the closeness between them (and revising his life story that he didn’t have friends). Interestingly, that is when Logue called him “Your Majesty,” as if to say, “Yes, indeed, we are friends, and I now also see you as the great King I knew you could be.”
It is no small matter to manage the parameters of power within working relationships. Suppose a king hired you, or a U.S. version of royalty (Bill Gates, President Obama, George Clooney)? Would you be able to maintain your core values and your boundaries? Would you be able to see this person as a real person, a partner in the working process? Or would awe, fear, self-congratulation, or greed (oooh, a client with deep pockets!) overwhelm you?
Lionel Logue was a stable force against which King George could struggle—pushing, pulling, arguing, avoiding, and embracing—all the ways a client may flounder while attempting something fearful. Logue created a genuine, safe relationship with crystal clear boundaries, and then he stayed available for as long as it took. No matter how outdated or unfounded many of his techniques, Logue was a master therapist of his time.
Questions for Reflection: What aspects of power in a relationship make you comfortable? Uncomfortable? When are you most aware of boundaries and challenges to them? With whom do you succeed most in managing power? Least?
Writing Prompts: “I manage power in a relationship best when ______” (then keep writing); “I end up in power struggles when ______” (then keep writing); “My boundaries tend to be strongest when ______” (then keep writing); “I know I need to watch my boundaries when ______” (then keep writing).







{ 15 comments… read them below or add one }
A great take on a great film. I perceived it in much the same way. Having been a voice teacher over so many years, I ran across a number of people who had stuttering problems. Amazing how Music could take those difficulties away as if by magic! Loved getting your perspective, Judy.
Bill/Austin
bill austin howe recently posted..My way of thinking/ reflections on a holiday
Hi Bill, If only the music could permanently solve the problem of stuttering. It’s one of those enigmas, much like (for some stutterers) acting on stage–takes away the stuttering for a bit but doesn’t translate. I’m sure you were wonderful to work with as a teacher! Glad you saw that film.
Great, amazing, marvelous – they are not enough to express my attitude to this film. I must say – deep, profound, elegant, intelligent!!
Anna recently posted..cerec veneers
Twitter: robertssister1
November 30, 2011 at 5:21 pm
Judy, Thank you for reminding me of this extraordinary movie. It took me a long time to watch it (I waited to rent it) but I’m so glad I did. It was everything you described (and you desscribed it so well!). It was so moving and I was mesmerized by Colin Firth. I don’t know if I could be as strict as Lionel, though. I did enjoy seeing the other side of him with his family. Such a great movie — thank you for writing the post. It was interesting to get your unique perspective since you were a speech pathologist.
Trish
http://www.robertssister.com
caregiving. family. advocacy.
Trish recently posted..Holidays & Tradition
Hi Trish, I know I would have caved to a Duke’s requests! I think that’s why I was so taken with Logue’s skills–he really believed he needed those boundaries to provide the service, so he stuck to his guns. Very admirable. (We waited to rent the movie, too! Plus we love the DVD extras.)
Twitter: salvatier
November 30, 2011 at 10:24 pm
I loved the movie and although I enjoyed the relationship between these two men, it was the love of his wife that made all the difference. That really spoke to me. Great post!
Dennis Salvatier recently posted..How John Cusack Helped Me Deal with Design Rejection
Dennis, I agree – the love of the King’s wife was so tender and free from judgment. Very beautiful. I particularly liked the part where she said she didn’t want the life of royalty and thought they were safe because he “stammered so beautifully”! That is definitely love speaking. Thanks for the comment.
Hi Dennis,
Yes, I agree–the love of the wife was beautiful. She was so devoted and tender. I particularly liked the part where she said that she never wanted the life of royalty but thought that because he “stammered so beautifully” they would be safe. Now that is love! Thanks for commenting.
Twitter: AtticusUncensor
December 1, 2011 at 4:42 pm
You know I love this movie, Judy! & wrote a post about it last February. This movie spoke to me on so many levels but I imagine with your training & background there was additional poignancy for you.
What resonated with me most in this movie was the journey to figuratively, as well as literally, find one’s voice.
Here’s Atticus’s take on King’s Speech, if you are interested:
http://www.atticusuncensored.com/2011/02/the-kings-speech-spoke-to-me/
Heidi & Atticus
Heidi & Atticus recently posted..Feistiness Knows No Age
Heidi & Atticus, One thing I love about this movie and what shows up in these comments is how individuals relate to different powerful themes in the movie. It’s a bit of a projective test, I guess! I can’t argue with you–the theme of having a voice is amazing in this, as is that scene you mention (which I also mentioned but from a different perspective!). I hadn’t read your post on this film, but I just did so and left my comment there. So glad you left the link for me.
Twitter: keepupweb
December 2, 2011 at 7:44 am
Judy, I confess that I had no interest in ever watching this movie but after reading your article, I’ll watch it now. Thanks so much for sharing your insight with us.
Sherryl Perry recently posted..Utilizing Social Media to Build Brand Awareness and Authority
Sherryl – There’s a lot to like in this movie and not much to avoid. I actually expected it to be a more difficult movie, somehow, but it moved very fast. Of course I had a particular way to identify with it because of my professional life, but my sense is that it’s a movie that captures people from different angles (if you read the other comments, you can see that different people comment on different themes). If you do watch it, let me know what you think!
I have not seen this movie but I may have to after reading your great post. I don’t know how many of us could treat a royal client the same as a regular client. Sounds like this is a very powerful movie.
It was, June, very powerful indeed. Also, since you have a special needs child, you might find it interesting in light of his lifetime of stuttering. He obviously suffered a lot of pain, as is typical for people who stutter and aren’t successful in improving their speech.
You were honestly late in watching this movie. It is one movie I have recommended & promoted everywhere whether its word of mouth or on FB. Myy favorite golfer Tiger Woods stuttered when a child.. Amazing story of transformation..
Mark Stevens recently posted..Bluehost